Topic:
Justified Use of the Military
Justified
use of the military isn’t something specific that we should have in writing; I
believe it should be a circumstantial decision left up to our President and
U.S. government leaders.
If you put
restrictions on when the U.S. military can be used, then you’re leaving a lot
up to chance. There are situations that can come up in the world where people
will want aid and support.
Half of
U.S. citizen might feel like our nation needs to provide relief, the other half
will reference a law or agreement that will keep us from getting involved.
The United
States are often looked up to for military help because we are one of the
biggest powers out there. So one of the main questions is, does that make it
our responsibility?
A lot of
people feel that just because we carry a lot of influence, doesn’t mean we
should use it. The idea of not getting involved with other country’s issues to
keep our military safe can be jumbled with the term “justified use.” They don’t
always translate.
Situations like
the one in Syria right now, that involve defenseless families, are the kind of
situations that we, as a stronger country, should want to help with. The U.S.
is actually doing all we can right now in Syria, without having to issue a
Declaration of War.
We are
issuing air strikes now and have been providing humanitarian aid and social
programs there since 2011. People from the U.S. (troops and volunteers) are
also in refugee camps helping with skills and training for any violence that
could be put upon them.
Some of our
troops are still in Iraq and Afghanistan trying to help maintain peace.
Although that involvement is a controversial move, since we’ve been there for
quite a while.
The pulling
of troops Afghanistan has been gradual, but the plan is to have them all out by
the end of 2016. This is good news for the United States, but some think it’s
long overdue.
The United
States efforts in Afghanistan didn’t stick, once most of our influence left,
the country abandon most of the organization we put in place. President Obama
spoke out and said, “We have to recognize Afghanistan will not be a perfect
place, and it is not America’s responsibility to make it one,” he said. “The
future of Afghanistan must be decided by Afghans.”
“Justified
use of the military” was bounced around a lot during that time. President Obama
and Secretary Clinton (at the time) both said that our interference in the
Middle East was necessary after the 9/11 attacks.
A lot of
citizens feel the U.S. overextends our time in other countries, and that it’s
good to help, but restrictions should limit our time there. That’s a compromise
that has yet to be made in our government.
Justified
use of the military is definitely an opinion. There will always be people who
won’t want to risk anything for a country that’s not ours. I like to think genuinely
good people who will be willing to use our resources to help others are running
our government. As a stable, strong country we should want to help other
countries and groups in crisis. Judging what times are appropriate for our assistance
is “justified use of the military.”
I thought this story was really good and you made your opinion clear. The only thing that I would change were the words "like" and "kind of" because it seems unsure, but this article was very well written
ReplyDelete